At the recent FRS-Sciences Po Conference on “Organized Crime and Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific,” experts gathered to delve into the interconnected issues driving environmental and economic crimes in the region. As emphasized by key speakers such as Hugo Rodrigues, Louis Marechal, and Sarah Ferguson, the Asia-Pacific region is becoming increasingly vulnerable to environmental crime, with severe implications for local communities, ecosystems, and international regulatory standards. Asia is often seen as a “dumping ground” for waste from wealthier countries, exacerbating social inequality, environmental degradation, and vulnerability to organized criminal networks.
Asia as a Dumping Ground for Environmental Crimes
One of the central concerns addressed at the conference was Asia’s role as an international repository for hazardous waste, often arriving illegally from wealthier nations and sometimes facilitated by multinational corporations that exploit legal loopholes or weak enforcement systems. As Hugo Rodrigues noted, certain French corporations have been accused of shipping toxic waste to Asia without proper authorization from French authorities. This pattern disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations in Asia, who are left to cope with dangerous pollutants while corporations skirt accountability. Local communities bear the environmental and health burdens of these crimes, while the media often focuses on smaller, visible players like local poachers and traffickers, ignoring the larger networks and enabling entities.
The illegal trade in natural resources compounds this issue. From illegal timber extraction to unregulated fishing, local ecosystems are disrupted, often leading to a cycle of poverty and environmental degradation. Louis Marechal aptly pointed out the ironic link between wealth and waste, observing, “The wealthier you are, the more you create waste.” This dynamic is starkly visible in the Asia-Pacific, where the growing global demand for commodities like timber, metals, and fish incentivizes illegal extraction and the overexploitation of resources.
The Vicious Cycle of Poaching and Poverty
Sarah Ferguson highlighted the critical role that apex predators, such as tigers, play in maintaining ecosystem balance. Tigers, which once roamed across 36 countries, now remain in only 13. They are essential for preserving biodiversity and ensuring ecosystem health, but relentless poaching driven by demand for tiger products has decimated their populations. The poaching of these animals is not an isolated issue; it is directly linked to socio-economic conditions. Impoverished communities, desperate for income, are drawn into illegal wildlife trade networks. These networks, controlled by international criminal organizations, exploit local poverty to supply lucrative illegal markets abroad.
Ferguson emphasized that addressing these problems demands a comprehensive, collective approach to protecting tigers and tackling the socio-economic factors driving poaching. When tigers disappear, ecosystems suffer, biodiversity declines, and communities lose natural resources, making them even more susceptible to exploitation by illegal networks. This vicious cycle can only be broken through collaborative action that addresses both conservation and poverty reduction.
Economic Crimes and Human Rights Violations in Resource Extraction
Another recurring theme at the conference was the relationship between economic crimes—such as corruption, tax evasion, and bribery—and human rights abuses in resource extraction. Louis Marechal shared insights from his team’s work on developing due diligence tools for companies to map their supply chains and prioritize risks related to human rights violations, such as child labor. However, meaningful implementation remains challenging, as companies continue to benefit from opaque supply chains and exploit resources with little accountability.
One example Marechal highlighted was the mica mining industry. Mica, an industrial mineral widely used in cosmetics and batteries, has become highly sought after in the last decade. Despite high demand, mica is often informally mined under unsafe and exploitative conditions in countries like India and Madagascar. These informal mining operations, characterized by child labor and unregulated practices, persist because of high global demand and insufficient regulatory oversight.
Tigers, Timber, and Transition to Sustainable Economies
The illegal trade in resources like gold, timber, and other minerals illustrates the scale and complexity of environmental crime in the Indo-Pacific. Gold, for example, is particularly convenient to transport and launder, making it a focal point for illegal economies. The timber trade similarly relies on both local and international criminal networks that facilitate the unsustainable logging of forests, eroding biodiversity and depriving communities of their environmental heritage. Transitioning to low-carbon, sustainable economies requires more than just environmental awareness; it demands accountability from corporations, rigorous law enforcement, and commitment from governments to combat illegal resource exploitation.
The Need for International Cooperation
One significant challenge discussed was the lack of intergovernmental cooperation to combat these interconnected issues. experts noted that environmental and economic crimes in the Indo-Pacific do not respect national borders, making it crucial for countries to share intelligence and align on policies. Yet, political rivalries and concerns over sovereignty hinder the seamless sharing of critical information. Countries often hesitate to collaborate, fearing that cooperation might expose national weaknesses, yet this reluctance only strengthens the criminal networks that exploit these divisions.
Conclusion: A Call for Collective Action
As I reflected during the conference, it is clear that these crimes cannot be addressed in isolation. Environmental crimes, economic exploitation, and human rights abuses are deeply interconnected in the Indo-Pacific. When resource extraction harms ecosystems, it exacerbates poverty, which in turn fuels poaching and illegal trade. Addressing these issues effectively requires a holistic approach that transcends national boundaries and recognizes the global interconnectedness of these crimes.
The Asia-Pacific region’s role as both a producer and a recipient of environmental and economic crimes underscores the need for comprehensive international cooperation. By holding corporations accountable, enforcing stringent environmental laws, and committing to cross-border partnerships, countries can start to dismantle the networks that fuel these crimes. As Ferguson urged, tackling these issues collectively and addressing root causes—such as poverty and inequality—are crucial to preserving the ecological and economic stability of the Indo-Pacific region.
Comments